Policy

Policy

Policy is a set of principles, guidelines, frameworks and actions that are intended to set standards for the behaviour of individuals, groups and populations and essentially, to solve problems (Knill & Tosun, 2020). Policies exist at government level, but all companies and organisations will have their own sets of policies that may have a positive impact on the workforce (Timms et al., 2015). Policies address problems within societies by providing a platform that aims to keep the public safe and from a health perspective, by preventing or reducing diseases or conditions that impact economically and on quality of life (QoL) (Eyler, 2016). For example, Davies, (2015) recognised that incontinence was a prevalent issue impacting negatively on individuals QoL and on society in terms of the economic impact on health services. They proposed that policies should be commissioned to provide educational programmes and physiotherapy services to address these matters. Thus when a policy is established, it demonstrates an intention which can increase resources and funding in order to solve a societal issue.

What is healthy public policy?

Healthy public policy (HPP) is policy which is not specifically designed for health but ultimately has a positive impact on health (Carey et al., 2014). It is concerned with the social and environmental issues that impact on health and places an important focus on the social determinants of health (Bryant et al., 2019). The health in all policies initiative is an example of HPP which was designed so that health is addressed in all policies and sectors, including business and politics, local and national government, that is, that the impacts of a given policy on health are considered in every policy at every level (Guglielmin et al., 2018).

Examples of healthy public policy include those targeting obesity. It is said that obesity is caused by the environment in which people live which is influenced by issues such as poor access to space for physical activity, high costs of healthy food and marketing of unhealthy foods (Marmot, 2015). A recent policy, gear for change: a bold vision for cycling and walking, aims to increase active travel and proposes to invest in infrastructure that supports active travel as well as making changes to the highway code which will make it safer for the public to do so (Hirst & Dempsey, 2020). By addressing healthy public policy, it allows questions to be raised regarding the efficacy of siloed approaches to policy that focus on the individual behaviour, many of which are ineffective (Raine et al., 2014), to a focus on the wider issues that are impacting on health. Ultimately, HPP allows for the creation of environments that are conducive to the health of all (Raphael, 2015).

Policy Formulation

Policy formulation refers to the process by which an idea or a problem is transformed into an action or set of actions and the outcomes which it produces. The process of policy formulation is dynamic; there is a process, but it is not typically followed in a linear or cyclical fashion. Policy formulation begins with establishing a problem and setting an agenda to solve it. The agenda is then implemented and evaluated, and the policy may be adapted if necessary (Hansson-Forman et al., 2021).

In theory, policies must be evidence based or at least informed by evidence and in health policy, epidemiological studies provide a basis for new policies to arise (Bhattacharya, 2013; Bowman et al., 2012; Smith, 2013).  Policy can also be informed by the experiences of political leaders such as the current United Kingdom (UK) Prime Minister Boris Johnson who invested £100 million in weight loss services due to the impact his weight had on the severity of his COVID-19 illness. Moreover, policy can be informed by external pressures from lay people who lobby for new policies such as seen in the gradual changes being made to domestic violence policies and laws which have the power to improve health (Crozier & Jarman-Howe, 2020; Gill & Theriault, 2005; UK Parliament, 2022).

There does appear to be a gap however, between identifying an issue through research, and forming policies or actions (Bowman et al., 2012; Kitson & Straus, 2010). This gap appears to occur due to the unrelatedness of researchers and policy makers but is potentially addressed with the use of a framework (Field et al., 2014; Smith, 2013). The framework identified that policy decision makers or all those who have a stake in actions, must become involved from the earliest stages of research through a process of co-production in order for the policy process to be successful (Smith, 2013).

Policies and power

A welfare state implements economic support such as for public pensions, healthcare and unemployment support. Welfare states are present in all developed capitalist nations to which the UK is one. The balance of equity within a nation may be dependent on the type of welfare state to which it belongs. The UK is considered a liberalist welfare state that prioritises the economic market and pro-business political parties. This has the effect of de-prioritising citizen economies and social security which increases health inequalities. In contrast, nations such as Sweden, Finland and Norway belong to a social democratic welfare state that prioritises equality, independent of employment status and as such, these countries have a higher level of health equality (Bryant et al., 2019).

Summary

Policies exist for the health and safety of the populations they serve. The formulation of policies is complex and not always derived from the best evidence available at the time. This can change but requires the coming together of all stakeholders, researchers and government bodies. Policies are driven largely by those in the highest power but every person within society has the ability to influence and change policy to create a better society for all.

References

Atkins, L., Francis, J., Islam, R., O’Connor, D., Patey, A., Ivers, N., Foy, R., Duncan, E. M., Colquhoun, H., Grimshaw, J. M., Lawton, R., & Michie, S. (2017). A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems. Implementation Science, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0605-9

Bambra, C., Gibson, M., Sowden, A., Wright, K., Whitehead, M., & Petticrew, M. (2010). Tackling the wider social determinants of health and health inequalities: Evidence from systematic reviews. In Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2008.082743

Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L

Bhattacharya, D. (2013). Public health policy: Issues, theories, and advocacy. Jossey-Bass.

Bowman, S., Unwin, N., Critchley, J., Capewell, S., Husseini, A., Maziak, W., Zaman, S., ben Romdhane, H., Fouad, F., Phillimore, P., Unal, B., Khatib, R., Shoaibi, A., & Ahmad, B. (2012). Use of evidence to support healthy public policy: a policy effectiveness-feasibility loop. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 90(11). https://doi.org/10.2471/blt.12.104968

Brierley, M. L., Chater, A. M., Smith, L. R., & Bailey, D. P. (2019). The Effectiveness of Sedentary Behaviour Reduction Workplace Interventions on Cardiometabolic Risk Markers: A Systematic Review. In Sports Medicine (Vol. 49, Issue 11). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01168-9

Bryant, T., Raphael, D., & Rioux, M. (Eds.). (2019). Staying Alive: Critical Perspectives on Health, Illness and Healthcare(3rd ed.). Canadian Scholars.

Cancer Research UK. (2019). Uterine cancer statistics. Https://Www.Cancerresearchuk.Org/Health-Professional/Cancer-Statistics/Statistics-by-Cancer-Type/Uterine-Cancer#heading-Six.

Carey, G., Crammond, B., & Keast, R. (2014). Creating change in government to address the social determinants of health: How can efforts be improved? BMC Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-1087

Chan, A. W., Tetzlaff, J. M., Gøtzsche, P. C., Altman, D. G., Mann, H., Berlin, J. A., Dickersin, K., Hróbjartsson, A., Schulz, K. F., Parulekar, W. R., Krleza-Jeric, K., Laupacis, A., & Moher, D. (2013). SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 346. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e7586

Clark, D. (2022, March 15). Number of full-time workers in the United Kingdom from May 1992 to January 2022. Https://Www.Statista.Com/Statistics/1119783/Full-Time-Workers-in-the-Uk/.

Crozier, S., & Jarman-Howe, M. (2020, February 28). Domestic Abuse Policy Framework. Https://Assets.Publishing.Service.Gov.Uk/Government/Uploads/System/Uploads/Attachment_data/File/877643/Domestic-Abuse-Pf.Pdf.

Davies, S. C. (2015). Annual Report of the Chief Medical Officer, 2014, The Health of the 51%: Women. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/595439/CMO_annual_report_2014.pdf

Eyler, A. (2016). Prevention, policy and public health. Oxford University Press.

Field, B., Booth, A., Ilott, I., & Gerrish, K. (2014). Using the Knowledge to Action Framework in practice: a citation analysis and systematic review. In Implementation science : IS (Vol. 9). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-014-0172-2

French, S. D., Green, S. E., O’Connor, D. A., McKenzie, J. E., Francis, J. J., Michie, S., Buchbinder, R., Schattner, P., Spike, N., & Grimshaw, J. M. (2012). Developing theory-informed behaviour change interventions to implement evidence into practice: a systematic approach using the Theoretical Domains Framework. Implementation Science, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-7-38

Gill, C., & Theriault, L. (2005). Connecting social determinants of health and woman abuse: A discussion paper. In 2nd Atlantic Summer Institute on Healthy and Safe Communities.

Gilson, N. D., Puig-Ribera, A., McKenna, J., Brown, W. J., Burton, N. W., & Cooke, C. B. (2009). Do walking strategies to increase physical activity reduce reported sitting in workplaces: A randomized control trial. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-6-43

Grimmett, C., Corbett, T., Brunet, J., Shepherd, J., Pinto, B. M., May, C. R., & Foster, C. (2019). Systematic review and meta-analysis of maintenance of physical activity behaviour change in cancer survivors. In International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity (Vol. 16, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-019-0787-4

Guglielmin, M., Muntaner, C., O’Campo, P., & Shankardass, K. (2018). A scoping review of the implementation of health in all policies at the local level. In Health Policy (Vol. 122, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.12.005

Gunnell, K. E., Crocker, P. R. E., Mack, D. E., Wilson, P. M., & Zumbo, B. D. (2014). Goal contents, motivation, psychological need satisfaction, well-being and physical activity: A test of self-determination theory over 6 months. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.08.005

Hansson-Forman, K., Reimerson, E., Bjärstig, T., & Sandström, C. (2021). A view through the lens of policy formulation: the struggle to formulate Swedish moose policy. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 23(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2021.1888700

Hawkes, R. E., Warren, L., Cameron, E., & French, D. P. (2022). An evaluation of goal setting in the NHS England diabetes prevention programme. Psychology and Health, 37(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2021.1872790

Hirst, D., & Dempsey, N. (2020). Active travel: Trends, policy and funding. www.parliament.uk/commons-library|intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library|papers@parliament.uk|@commonslibrary

Hoffmann, T. C., Glasziou, P. P., Boutron, I., Milne, R., Perera, R., Moher, D., Altman, D. G., Barbour, V., Macdonald, H., Johnston, M., Kadoorie, S. E. L., Dixon-Woods, M., McCulloch, P., Wyatt, J. C., Phelan, A. W. C., & Michie, S. (2014). Better reporting of interventions: Template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ (Online), 348. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g1687

Jones, N. R. V., Tong, T. Y. N., & Monsivais, P. (2018). Meeting UK dietary recommendations is associated with higher estimated consumer food costs: An analysis using the National Diet and Nutrition Survey and consumer expenditure data, 2008-2012. Public Health Nutrition, 21(5). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980017003275

Kitson, A., & Straus, S. E. (2010). The knowledge-to-action cycle: Identifying the gaps. In CMAJ (Vol. 182, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.081231

Knill, C., & Tosun, J. (2020). Public policy: A new introduction. . Bloomsbury Publishing .

Koutoukidis, D. A., Beeken, R. J., Manchanda, R., Burnell, M., Ziauddeen, N., Michalopoulou, M., Knobf, M. T., & Lanceley, A. (2019). Diet, physical activity, and health-related outcomes of endometrial cancer survivors in a behavioral lifestyle program: The Diet and Exercise in Uterine Cancer Survivors (DEUS) parallel randomized controlled pilot trial. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, 29(3). https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2018-000039

Koutoukidis, D. A., Lopes, S., Atkins, L., Croker, H., Knobf, M. T., Lanceley, A., & Beeken, R. J. (2018). Use of intervention mapping to adapt a health behavior change intervention for endometrial cancer survivors: The shape-up following cancer treatment program. BMC Public Health, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5329-5

Marmot, M. (2015). The Health Gap: The challenge of an uequal world. Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.

McIntyre, S. A., Francis, J. J., Gould, N. J., & Lorencatto, F. (2018). The use of theory in process evaluations conducted alongside randomized trials of implementation interventions: A systematic review. In Translational Behavioral Medicine(Vol. 10, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/iby110

Michie, S., van Stralen, M. M., & West, R. (2011). The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Science, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-42

Mulchandani, R., Chandrasekaran, A. M., Shivashankar, R., Kondal, D., Agrawal, A., Panniyammakal, J., Tandon, N., Prabhakaran, D., Sharma, M., & Goenka, S. (2019). Effect of workplace physical activity interventions on the cardio-metabolic health of working adults: Systematic review and meta-analysis. In International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity (Vol. 16, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-019-0896-0

Owen, N., Sugiyama, T., Eakin, E. E., Gardiner, P. A., Tremblay, M. S., & Sallis, J. F. (2011). Adults’ sedentary behavior: Determinants and interventions. In American Journal of Preventive Medicine (Vol. 41, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2011.05.013

Raine, K. D., Nykiforuk, C. I. J., Vu-Nguyen, K., Nieuwendyk, L. M., VanSpronsen, E., Reed, S., & Wild, T. C. (2014). Understanding key influencers’ attitudes and beliefs about healthy public policy change for obesity prevention. Obesity, 22(11). https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.20860

Raphael, D. (2015). Beyond policy analysis: The raw politics behind opposition to healthy public policy. In Health Promotion International (Vol. 30, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dau044

Sebire, S. J., Banfield, K., Campbell, R., Edwards, M. J., Kipping, R., Kadir, B., Garfield, K., Matthews, J., Blair, P. S., Lyons, R. A., Hollingworth, W., & Jago, R. (2019). A peer-led physical activity intervention in schools for adolescent girls: a feasibility RCT. Public Health Research, 7(16). https://doi.org/10.3310/phr07160

Smith, K. (2013). Beyond evidence based policy in public health: The interplay of ideas. Palgrave Macmillan.

Soni, A., Beeken, R. J., McGowan, L., Lawson, V., Chadwick, P., & Croker, H. (2021). ‘Shape-Up’, a Modified Cognitive-Behavioural Community Programme for Weight Management: Real-World Evaluation as an Approach for Delivering Public Health Goals. Nutrients, 13(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13082807

Stults-Kolehmainen, M. A., & Sinha, R. (2014). The effects of stress on physical activity and exercise. In Sports Medicine(Vol. 44, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-013-0090-5

Timms, C., Brough, P., O’Driscoll, M., Kalliath, T., Siu, O. L., Sit, C., & Lo, D. (2015). Flexible work arrangements, work engagement, turnover intentions and psychological health. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 53(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12030

UK Parliament. (2022). Lobbying Parliament. Https://Www.Parliament.Uk/Get-Involved/Contact-an-Mp-or-Lord/Lobbying-Parliament/.

White, M., Adams, J., & Heywood, P. (2009). How and why do interventions that increase health overall widen inequalities within populations? In Social Inequality and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt9qgz3s.10

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *